AmanaOnline

News

THE CASE FOR PRISON REFORMS IN NIGERIA. A PAPER PRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE NIGERIAN BAR ASSOCIATION. — by MAIYAKI THEODORE BALA Ph.D, 

THE CASE FOR PRISON REFORMS IN NIGERIA. A PAPER PRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE NIGERIAN BAR ASSOCIATION.  —  by MAIYAKI THEODORE BALA Ph.D, 
February 07
14:32 2024

August 2015

ABSTRACT

The journey towards achieving ideal custodial conditions for our inmates in Nigeriahas remained intractable and as old as the prison system itself. A juxtaposition of the present state of our prisons in Nigeria with what obtains in other civilized Countries of the world has left so much more to be desired having avoidable gaps between the law,regulations, politics and what obtains in real life. The challenge has remained the complete obliteration of the fundamental Human Rights of the inmates through the subhuman custodial conditions to which they are subjected. The foregoing conditions have been exacerbated by the deplorable working conditions under which the personnel under whose care the prisons and inmates have been kept operate. A classical case of “The hunter has become the hunted”. The case for the reform of the Nigerian prisons has long been over-due drawing from contemporary global best practices and the compelling need to respect the constitutional rights of the inmates.This paper evaluates the conditions of our prisons and makes far reaching prescriptions for radical and compelling reforms.

INTRODUCTION

The Nigerian prisons have been a part and parcel of the Nigerian nation-state. They are not insulated from the challenges of development and growth that other sectors of our national lives have been and still passing through. It is therefore a given to posit that over the years, our prison system has gone through avoidable decay, retrogression and in some cases stagnation. Facilities in our prisons have remained largely undeveloped and mundane; the complimentary criminal justice system has remained volonial and undeveloped, not reflecting contemporary realities. Successive Nigerian governments have introduced policies and reform agenda that had largely remained on paper without the desirable impact or the realization of the target deliverables. Just like the other sectors of our national lives therefore, the prison system has long been yearning and is due for comprehensive and sustainable reforms. These reforms are expected to align our detention and custodial systems and practices with the best around the world whilst concurrently guaranteeing the outcomes associated with the primary purposes of imprisonment.Generally speaking, when an individual is incarcerated in our prisons, the constitutional implication is that the said individual would be deprived of his right to liberty and those rights that would naturally be restrictive by reason of the said deprivation of his liberty. It is however disturbing to note that the extant experiences in our prison systems in Nigeria are the unacceptable and total annihilation of the residual rights of the inmate in aberration of the constitutional guarantee of the fundamental human rights of the individual as contained in chapter IV of the 1999constitution as amended. This is particularly so with regard to the right to human dignity as contained in section 34 of the said Constitution.A case for the reform of our prisons system in Nigeria is Co extensively a case for the reform of the Criminal Justice system. This is given to the fact that the custodial Institutions are at the receiving end of the outcomes from our Criminal justice practices. Where the system is distilled and geared towards efficacious engagement of the prisoners or detainees, the backlash on the prison Institution would in turn be mitigated, and where otherwise, the strain is obstructive and damaging to the goal of Imprisonment. It follows therefore that the foundation of Prison reforms lies with an imperative and concurrent status or reform of the Criminal justice system along with how much it impacts on imprisonment in Nigeria.Over the years, successive governments have lamented the deplorable, unacceptable and inhuman conditions of our prisons as custodial and correctional homes for offenders and awaiting trial detainees. This is even truer since the advent of democracy in Nigeria. The prison system happens to be one of our democratic institutions, upon which the rule of law is founded, built and assessed. In response to these concerns, some of these regimes have initiated policies and actions aimed at ameliorating the degenerating and inexcusable experiences in the system and structure of our prisons. How far these efforts have yielded results underscores the thrust of this paper.In addressing the subject of this presentation, we visited the Kuje prison in the FCT(our case study) to see things for ourselves and served the prison authority with a questioner, the answers to which formed the basis of our evaluation and conclusions.In order to engage the work in a comparative interface, we visited the Lafia prison in Nasarawa State and the Idda prison in kogi State. We have also attempted to juxtapose our prison reform efforts with what obtains in the United States of America, the United Kingdom and other persuasive jurisdictions with a view to presenting a compendious contribution in making a case for the reform of our prisons. In consequence, the paper came up with prescriptive measures, which perhaps would contribute to the bouquet of ongoing efforts to modernize our prisons and bring them in line with global best practices.

THE SOCIOLOGY OF PRISONS AND IMPRISONMENT

A prison has been variously described by different scholars on the basis of their perceptions and sociological backgrounds. Mc Corkle and Korn defined a prison tomean a physical structure in a geographical location where a number of people living under highly specialized conditions adjust to the alternatives presented to them by the unique kind of social environment.

Okunola also views a prison as a place ‘where people are highly secluded from the rest of the world with entirely new order of control’. Laudable as these definitions maybe, it is submitted with respect that they appear to view imprisonment form the perspective of confinement under a physical structure and subjected to certain control measures. On the contrary, modern concepts of Imprisonment accommodate scenarios where persons may be outside the confines of a physical wall yet be deemed as being in prison or serving terms. This is typical incases where one is sentenced to community service, on parole, or even under suspended sentences.Another school of thought views Imprisonment as “a place to punish offenders, where criminals that are removed from the society are dumped to protect the society from further criminal activities of the offenders, and a place to rehabilitate and teach the offenders to be Law abiding and productive after their release”.

Goffman on the other hand held that a prison is a place where “there’s a basic split between a large class of individuals who have restricted contact with the outside world and a stereotypical behavioral pattern where social mobility is restricted.

The foregoing definitions have again made far-reaching assumptions about prisons.These definitions viewed the prison as a home for deviants of society and so did not factor in the perspective of the prisons also as a residence for remanding persons awaiting trials. From the provisions of section 36 of the 1999 Constitution, this class of persons is presumed innocent until proven guilty. They cannot rightly be categorized as deviants of society and therefore vagrants. Where a person awaits trial there is the chance he could be set free where the case against him is not proved. There are also classes of people who are even found guilty in the first, second or more,instances, yet set free on appeal. Would it then be right to have preemptively condemned this class of prisoners as deviants without prove? It would appear from a community reading of the foregoing literature that a prison is the condition a person is subjected to following an order of the Court simpliciter.The foregoing humble submission encapsulates the different dimensions of imprisonment. This is particularly so because the theme of imprisonment starts from the order of the Court. No one is in prison that is not there by order of Court and sucha person is held, treated, categorized or even released by order of Court. It follows therefore that the general concept of imprisonment must flow naturally from the orders or directions given by Court. Put another way therefore, imprisonment is that condition where one is subjected to the control of the prisons under circumstances that he is restricted, treated, he behaves or that he is subjected to such other conditions that are consistent with the orders of a competent Court of Law.

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF IMPRISONMENT

It is generally observed by different scholars that in the quest to protect society and concurrently reform the offender, imprisonment has engendered equilibrium in society. What agitates the mind is the result flowing from recent evaluation of the outcomes of imprisonment. Without doubt, records abundantly show that many prisoners come out of incarceration worse than they went in and that the chance of reoffending remains pretty high. The foregoing reality derives from the evolving conditions that inmates confront whilst in prison. This is to be without prejudice to the people and practices that they face whilst in prison. It follows therefore that there forms of our prisons must be multifaceted inviting a redefinition of purpose and pursuit. This would incumbently involve sociological reviews and examinations amongst others. Scholars have designated the following as the general purpose of imprisonment.

1. Punishment;

2. Deterrence

3. Rehabilitation and reformation

  1. Protection of the Public

The foregoing objectives have completely eluded the outcomes of served-out prison terms. Empirical research shows that in Nigeria, and indeed most parts of the world,the prison is a reservoir of the downtrodden and the under privileged, mostly less.

Ibid

References

1

Mc Coorkle L, Korn R: Resolution within Walls. The Annuals of American Academy of PoliticalScience. 1954. 293 (i): Pg 88-89

2

Obioha E.E: Challenges and Reforms in the Nigerian Prison System. Research Gate Publications.Article 2011 Pg 69.

3

Goffman E. Asylum, Newyork. Garden City Anchor Books. 1961.

 

 

Disclaimer

Disclaimer


The information contained in this portal is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by AmanaOnline.com.ng.

While we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, availability or guarantees, with respect to the claim and/or the website, or the information, the products, the services, or the related graphics contained on the website, for any purpose.

Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
Information presented on this website is considered public information (unless otherwise noted) and may be re-distributed or copied.

Use of appropriate byline/photo/image credit is requested.

AmanaOnline © 2001

Search AmanaOnline

Archives

Reset password

Enter your email address and we will send you a link to change your password.

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

Sign up with email

Get started with your account

to save your favourite homes and more

By clicking the «SIGN UP» button you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
Powered by Estatik